17 Mar 2018
What happens when an unprivileged user runs the binary
-r-s---r-x 1 root root 1024 Mar 17 21:57 binary
which executes the following lines of code?
setreuid(geteuid(), geteuid()); system("/bin/sh");
Let’s find out. First, we need to understand what a uid is.
The POSIX standard defines three different user identifiers. These allow processes to dynamically take on different roles, providing they have the required privileges.
- The real uid identifies the (real) owner of a process. The real uid can be manipulated with
setreuid(uid_t ruid, uid_t euid).
- The effective uid of a process is used for access control. It is also used as the owner for files created by that process. See
seteuid(uid_t euid)(note that confusingly,
setuidalso sets the effective uid).
- The saved uid is used to store the effective user id when it is changed temporarily. For example, a privileged process may need do some unprivileged work. To do this, it would change its euid. But it would not be able to change back unless its original (privileged) euid was stored somewhere. That’s where the saved uid comes in: an unprivileged process may set its euid exclusively to one of uid, suid, or euid.
Processes are managed by the kernel using a process descriptor. In practice, this is a
task_struct struct, containing all the process information that the kernel needs. This includes a pointer to a
cred struct, which stores the different uids mentioned above. This is how the kernel determines whether or not a process has the privileges to do something.
When a process is created, it inherits the real and effective uids of its parent. So when a user runs a binary, the resulting process will typically have the uid and euid of the user. If that were all that was at play, the above example would simply open a shell as the user. So what gives?
It turns out file permissions are also involved. In addition to the familiar read, write and executable bits for owner, group, and others, there are several special modes. One of these is the setuid bit. If this bit is set, executing the file will result in a process with the effective uid of the owner of the file. This is the
s instead of the
x in the example above.
When the user executes the binary above, a process is created with the uid of the user, but the euid of root (or 0). The process then sets its own uid to that of its euid (root). It then spawns a shell, which inherits the uid and euid of the process—i.e. a privileged shell.
So why, then, is the call to
setreuid even necessary? In theory it shouldn’t be, and there probably exist shells for which it isn’t. But for security reasons, bash explicitly checks for the setuid case and uses its root powers to drop privileges. In other words, it will drop its effective uid down to its real uid, making the call to
setreuid a necessity.